Bolden v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bolden v. State

157 S.W.3d 410, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, 2005 WL 589297

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketWD 63757

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 410 (Bolden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolden v. State, 157 S.W.3d 410, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, 2005 WL 589297 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Bolden appeals the denial of his Rule- 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Bolden appeals the denial of his Rule- 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 410, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, 2005 WL 589297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolden-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack