Bolden v. State

54 So. 241, 98 Miss. 723
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellant was convicted in the court below of the crime of arson, and sentenced to the penitentiary for the term of his natural life.

The burning of the house was abundantly proven. The only evidence introduced, other than the alleged confession of appellant, which tended to show that the burning was caused by a criminal agency, was that the burning occurred at night, that the fire originated on- the outside of the house, and that shortly after the house had burned tracks which resembled those of appellant, who lived several miles from the scene, were discovered about seventy-five yards from the place where the building had stood. A criminal agency may be established by circumstances, but this evidence is wholly insufficient to do so. Spears v. State, 92 Miss. 613, 46 South. 166, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 285.

The corpus delicti, therefore, not having been proven by evidence other than the alleged confession of appellant, the judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.'

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolden v. State, 54 So. 241, 98 Miss. 723 (Mich. 1910).

54 So. 241 (Bolden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. State
954 So. 2d 968 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2007)
Dilworth v. State
909 So. 2d 731 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2005)
Warren Jerome Dilworth v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2004
Charles Wayne Ross v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1997
Isaac v. State
645 So. 2d 903 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1994)
Mister v. State
190 So. 2d 869 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1966)
Williams v. State
72 So. 2d 147 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Ratcliff v. State
54 So. 947 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)