Bolden v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Bolden v. State

130 N.E.2d 52, 234 Ind. 708, 1955 Ind. LEXIS 198

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1955

DocketNo. 0-416

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 130 N.E.2d 52 (Bolden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolden v. State, 130 N.E.2d 52, 234 Ind. 708, 1955 Ind. LEXIS 198 (Ind. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Bobbitt, J.

Petitioner herein has attempted to perfect an appeal to this court under Bule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of error, nor do they contain any of the record necessary to present the questions which petitioner is apparently attempting to raise, nor does it in any other manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.

The petition is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court under Rule 2-40, and for this reason it should be dismissed. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.

Petition dismissed.

Emmert, C. J., Achor, Arterburn and Landis JJ., concur.

Note.—Reported in 130 N. E. 2d 52.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI