Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

895 A.2d 526

DecidedMarch 29, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 895 A.2d 526 (Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 895 A.2d 526 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The parties are directed to address the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s decision that a door closing mechanism on a train is a “part and appurtenance” within the meaning of the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA) in determining strict liability for an injury sustained by a railroad employee?

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The parties are directed to address the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s decision that a door closing mechanism on a train is a “part and appurtenance” within the meaning of the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA) in determining strict liability for an injury sustained by a railroad employee?

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 A.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolden-v-southeastern-pennsylvania-transportation-authority-pa-2006.