Bolden v. Massanari

40 F. App'x 776
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 2002
DocketNo. 02-1356
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 F. App'x 776 (Bolden v. Massanari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolden v. Massanari, 40 F. App'x 776 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie N. Bolden appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security in his action for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bolden v. Massa-nari, No. CA 01-48-2 (W.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Pee Dee Community Action Agency, Inc
537 U.S. 1057 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 F. App'x 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolden-v-massanari-ca4-2002.