Bolcar v. Mintz
198 A. 847, 120 N.J.L. 186, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bolcar v. Mintz. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 N.J.L. 219 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bolcar v. Mintz, 198 A. 847, 120 N.J.L. 186, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 346 (N.J. 1938).
198 A. 847 (Bolcar v. Mintz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.