Bolanos v. Holder

344 F. App'x 403

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Leticia Morales de Bolanos and Pedro Bolanos Yllescas, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any errors of fact or law in the BIA’s April 10, 2006, order denying their motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). Petitioners have waived any challenge to the BIA’s conclusion that, construed as a motion to reopen, the motion was numerically barred. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.