Boland v. Overlade

136 N.E.2d 722, 235 Ind. 706, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 231
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1956
DocketNo. 0-453
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 N.E.2d 722 (Boland v. Overlade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boland v. Overlade, 136 N.E.2d 722, 235 Ind. 706, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 231 (Ind. 1956).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has filed original action in this court in which he has petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus against the warden of the Indiana State Prison where petitioner is confined.

This court is without jurisdiction to entertain the proceedings as it is well settled the Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction of actions for writ of habeas corpus. There is ample [707]*707jurisdiction in nisi prius courts to issue such writs in proper cases, with remedy by appeal to this court if the writ is erroneously denied. See: State ex rel. Taylor v. Dowd, Warden (1944), 222 Ind. 289, 53 N. E. 2d 543. Certiorari denied 322 U. S. 737, 64 S. Ct. 1049, 88 L. Ed. 1571; Jones v. Dowd, Warden (1941), 219 Ind. 114, 37 N. E. 2d 68.

Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 136 N. E. 2d 722.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hickey v. ESTATE OF HICKEY ETC.
136 N.E.2d 722 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.E.2d 722, 235 Ind. 706, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boland-v-overlade-ind-1956.