Home/New York Supreme Court/Boland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Boland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 890
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 890 (Boland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 890 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the question of damages should have been submitted to the jury. Ihl v. Railroad Co., 47 N. Y. 317 ; Gorham v. Railroad Co., 23 Hun, 449; Birkett v. Ice Co., 110 N. Y. 504 ; 18 St. Rep., 130 ; Murray v. Usher, 117 N. Y. 542 ; 27 St. Rep., 928; Code Civil Proc. § 1904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Birkett v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.
18 N.E. 108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Murray v. . Usher
23 N.E. 564 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Ihl v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry Railroad
47 N.Y. 317 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boland-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nysupct-1893.