Boland v. Kaveny

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Boland v. Kaveny

62 A. 552, 72 N.J.L. 314, 43 Vroom 314, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 125

DecidedNovember 20, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A. 552 (Boland v. Kaveny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boland v. Kaveny, 62 A. 552, 72 N.J.L. 314, 43 Vroom 314, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 125 (N.J. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The state of the case discloses no record except of an order of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of a District Court. There is no transcript, or pleadings, or state of the case. In this condition of the record before us, we think the writ of error should be dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief J ustice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green. 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The state of the case discloses no record except of an order of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of a District Court. There is no transcript, or pleadings, or state of the case. In this condition of the record before us, we think the writ of error should be dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief J ustice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green. 10.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A. 552, 72 N.J.L. 314, 43 Vroom 314, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boland-v-kaveny-nj-1905.