Boland v. Dig America, Inc.
This text of 277 A.D.2d 337 (Boland v. Dig America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants in Action No. 2 appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated March 8, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in Action No. 2 on the ground that the plaintiff in that action did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion. [338]*338In support of their motion, the appellants submitted proof that a magnetic resonance imaging of the plaintiffs cervical spine showed a “posterior herniation of the C5-6 intervertebral disc.” A disc herniation may constitute a serious injury within the meaning of the Insurance Law (see, Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756, 757). The appellants failed to demonstrate that the herniation was not related to the subject accident (see, Chaplin v Taylor, 273 AD2d 188). Accordingly, the appellants failed to make out a prima facie case for judgment as a matter of law. Under these circumstances, we need not consider whether the respondent’s papers were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy, 226 AD2d 437). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 337, 717 N.Y.S.2d 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boland-v-dig-america-inc-nyappdiv-2000.