Boland MacH. & Mfg. Co. v. Favret
This text of 176 So. 401 (Boland MacH. & Mfg. Co. v. Favret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter comes up on motion to dismiss the appeal because of the fact that the transcript as filed did not contain or make reference to certain exhibits. The transcript, though incomplete because it failed to contain the exhibits or reference thereto, was filed in this court within the time provided by law. Appellant has now filed in this court certificate of the deputy clerk of the first city court of New Orleans that the said exhibits have been filed, and the *402 said deputy clerk has now corrected the index of the transcript so that it shows the said exhibits have been filed and have been retained in the office of the clerk of the first city court and deposited for safekeeping in the vault, as is customary. They may thus be obtained by us when necessary.
Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 234 of 1932, the motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.
Motion to dismiss overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 So. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boland-mach-mfg-co-v-favret-lactapp-1937.