Bolan v. Peeples

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Bolan v. Peeples

3 S.C.L. 109

DecidedApril 15, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 109 (Bolan v. Peeples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolan v. Peeples, 3 S.C.L. 109 (S.C. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Although in this case, one exception taken to the charge of the judge to tbq jury, on the trial, is well grounded, and the judge was mistaken in $he direction he gave upon that point; yet as justice, upon the. [110]*110whole, appears to have been done in the case ; and as it further more appears, that the action is not maintainable on the ground stated >n fhe declaration, and that it could not answer any useful end to grant a new trial; let the motion be discharged, and the defendant at liberty to enter up his judgment, 2 Burr. 665. 1 Wils. 22. 2 Bl. Rep. 1222. Edmondson v. Machell, 2 T. R. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Although in this case, one exception taken to the charge of the judge to tbq jury, on the trial, is well grounded, and the judge was mistaken in $he direction he gave upon that point; yet as justice, upon the. [110]*110whole, appears to have been done in the case ; and as it further more appears, that the action is not maintainable on the ground stated >n fhe declaration, and that it could not answer any useful end to grant a new trial; let the motion be discharged, and the defendant at liberty to enter up his judgment, 2 Burr. 665. 1 Wils. 22. 2 Bl. Rep. 1222. Edmondson v. Machell, 2 T. R. 4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.C.L. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolan-v-peeples-sc-1802.