Bokkelen v. . Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford
60 N.E. 1112, 167 N.Y. 590, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1169
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Martin and Vann, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bokkelen v. . Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford, 60 N.E. 1112, 167 N.Y. 590, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1169 (N.Y. 1901).
60 N.E. 1112 (Bokkelen v. . Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldman v. Commercial Travellers Eastern Accident Ass'n
18 N.E.2d 373 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Dolge v. Commercial Casualty Insurance
211 A.D. 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Farber v. Mutual Life Insurance
145 N.E. 535 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Weil v. Globe Indemnity Co.
179 A.D. 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)