Bokhair v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bokhair v. Board of Education

54 A.D.2d 932, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 932 (Bokhair v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bokhair v. Board of Education, 54 A.D.2d 932, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to reinstate certain attendance and classroom teachers, petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 12, 1976, as dismissed, without prejudice, so much of the petition as relates to attendance teachers. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Since there is absent in this record proof of a total elimination of attendance officers in community school districts, the proper disposition of this proceeding is governed by our decision in Matter of Geduldig v Board of Educ. (43 AD2d 840). Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to reinstate certain attendance and classroom teachers, petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 12, 1976, as dismissed, without prejudice, so much of the petition as relates to attendance teachers. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Since there is absent in this record proof of a total elimination of attendance officers in community school districts, the proper disposition of this proceeding is governed by our decision in Matter of Geduldig v Board of Educ. (43 AD2d 840). Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 932, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bokhair-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack