Boker v. Bronson
3 F. Cas. 808, 5 Blatchf. 5
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The question of practice in this case is, whether the decision of the judge is to be considered as an order, or whether a regular order should have been entered. The practice in this court is, to enter an order upon a decision made by the court. As no such order was entered in this case, the defendant was not in default in not paying the costs. The proper course was for the plaintiff to enter the order and serve a copy of it.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boker v. Bronson, 3 F. Cas. 808, 5 Blatchf. 5 (circtsdny 1861).
3 F. Cas. 808 (Boker v. Bronson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rust v. State
19 S.W. 763 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1892)
People v. Tyler
7 Mich. 161 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1859)