Boker v. Bronson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Boker v. Bronson

3 F. Cas. 808, 5 Blatchf. 5

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 F. Cas. 808 (Boker v. Bronson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boker v. Bronson, 3 F. Cas. 808, 5 Blatchf. 5 (circtsdny 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

SMADLEY, District Judge.

The question of practice in this case is, whether the decision of the judge is to be considered as an order, or whether a regular order should have been entered. The practice in this court is, to enter an order upon a decision made by the court. As no such order was entered in this case, the defendant was not in default in not paying the costs. The proper course was for the plaintiff to enter the order and serve a copy of it.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMADLEY, District Judge.

The question of practice in this case is, whether the decision of the judge is to be considered as an order, or whether a regular order should have been entered. The practice in this court is, to enter an order upon a decision made by the court. As no such order was entered in this case, the defendant was not in default in not paying the costs. The proper course was for the plaintiff to enter the order and serve a copy of it.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. Cas. 808, 5 Blatchf. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boker-v-bronson-circtsdny-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack