Bojja v. Jaddou

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: June 18, 2024
• Docket: 5:22-cv-04867
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 BERNARD P. WOLFSDORF Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP 2 1416 2nd Street Santa Monica, CA 90401 3 Tel: (310) 570-4088 4 bernard@wolfsdorf.com

5 Attorneys for Plaintiff

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSEDIVISION

8 HARSHA BOJJA, 5:22-cv-04867-VKD 9 Plaintiffs, 10 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT v. AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE 11 STAY OF PROCEEIDNGS; [PROPOSED] UR JADDOU, Director, United States ORDER 12 Citizenship and Immigration Services, Re: Dkt. No. 23 13 Defendant. Judge Virgina DeMarchi 14 Pursuant to the Court’s Order, the parties submit this joint case management statement regarding 15 the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Babaria v. Blinken, 87 F.4th 963 (9th Cir. 2023). See Dkt. No. 25. On 16 January 15, 2024, the Appellants in Babaria v. Blinken, No. 22-16700 (9th Cir.) filed a timely petition for 17 panel rehearing or rehearing en banc. The Circuit Court denied that motion on March 4, 2024, giving 18 Appellants until June 3, 2024 to file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. The 19 Appellants filed their petition for certiorari on May 31, 2024. Babaria v. Blinken, No. 23-1268 (May 31, 20 2024). The government’s response is due on July 5, 2024. Id. 21 Thus, the parties have conferred and hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to grant 22 the following requests: 23 1. The parties request that the Court stay the proceedings in this case until the latest of the 24 following two possibilities: 25 (a) the U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari; or 26 (b) the U.S. Supreme Court enters an order on the merits. 27 1 2. Plaintiffs agree to provide the Court notice within 7 days of the U.S. Supreme Court 2 denying certiorari; or the U.S. Supreme Court entering an order on the merits. 3 The parties respectfully request that the Court adopt the above-proposed schedule and enter a 4 scheduling order reflecting the same. 5 Dated: June 17, 2024 Respectfully submitted,1 6 ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney 7

8 s/ Elizabeth D. Kurlan ELIZABETH D. KURLAN 9 Assistant United States Attorney

10 Attorneys for Defendant

12 Dated: June 17,, 2024 sBernard Wolfsdorf 13 BERNARD WOLFSDORF

14 Attorneys for Plaintiff

26 27 1 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories listed herein concur in the filing of this document. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The proceedings in this case remain 3 || stayed. 4 5 |] Date: June 18, 2024 6 o 28 .

United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Status Report and Stipulation 2-99 _cruy_NS591_ST