BOJANG v. GARLAND

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 26, 2025
Docket3:24-cv-00152
StatusUnknown

This text of BOJANG v. GARLAND (BOJANG v. GARLAND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BOJANG v. GARLAND, (W.D. Pa. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MUSTAPHA BOJANG, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 3:24-152 ) Judge Nora Barry Fischer PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, et. al., ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly ) Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2025, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on April 3, 2025, (Docket No. 35), recommending that Motion to Dismiss the Petition as Moot filed by Respondents, (Docket No. 32) be granted and that this case be dismissed because Petitioner Mustapha Bojang failed to respond to the Motion to Dismiss arguing that his § 2241 habeas petition challenging the length of his immigration custody was moot as he had been released from immigration custody and deported and removed from the United States on February 14, 2025, and the Magistrate Judge having directed that objections were due from non-ECF users by April 21, 2025, and no objections having been filed as of the date of this Memorandum Order, this matter having been recently reassigned to the undersigned for prompt disposition of the matter, and upon independent review of the record and de novo consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s April 3, 2025 Report and Recommendation, (Docket No. 35), which is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss the Petition as Moot (Docket No. 32) filed by Respondents is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 25(d), the request by Respondents to substitute Pamela Bondi for former United States Attorney General Merrick Garland; Kristi Noem for former Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas; and Moises Becerra as DHS field office director is GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the § 2241 Petition (Docket No. 9) is dismissed, with prejudice, as moot and no certificate of appealability shall issue, see Goodloe v. Warden Lewisburg USP, 2025 WL 342189, *1, n.1 (3d Cir. 2025) (citing Reese v. Warden Phila. FDC, 904 F.3d 244, 246 (3d Cir. 2018) (“a federal prisoner challenging the denial of a § 2241 petition […] need not obtain a certificate of appealability”); IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appropriate Judgment follows.

s/Nora Barry Fischer Nora Barry Fischer Senior U.S. District Judge cc/ecf: Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly cc: Mustapha Bojang 205154966 Golden State Annex 611 Frontage Road McFarland, CA 93250 (via first class mail)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Troy Reese v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
904 F.3d 244 (Third Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BOJANG v. GARLAND, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bojang-v-garland-pawd-2025.