Bojanek v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.

25 A.D.2d 486, 266 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5124
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs to respondents. Memorandum: Plaintiffs’ motion sought discovery of a statement made to defendant by its bus driver, who had taken the names of the passengers on defendant’s bus at the time of the accident. Special Term properly permitted discovery of this statement made in the regular course of defendant’s business. The terms of its order, however, would also permit discovery of postlitigation statements which were not sought by the motion and to which plaintiffs were not entitled. The order should be modified so as to permit discovery of only the statement made to defendant by its bus driver before any action was commenced which appellant concedes was made two days after the accident. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term granting motion to require defendant to furnish copy of accident report and names and addresses of all persons on defendant’s bus.)

Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry and Del Veeehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bojanek v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., 25 A.D.2d 486, 266 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

25 A.D.2d 486 (Bojanek v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montag v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n
122 Misc. 2d 382 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Weaver v. Waterville Knitting Mills, Inc.
78 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)