Boitel v. Shilling
163 A.D. 911
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the authority of Fisher Malting Co. v. Brown (92 App. Div. 251); McMann v. Brown (Id. 249); Brown v. Gauss (95 N. Y. Supp. 538); McGrath v. Murtha & Schmohl Co. (128 App. Div. 278); Holtzoff v. Dodge & Olcott Co. (134 id. 353). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boitel v. Shilling, 163 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
163 A.D. 911 (Boitel v. Shilling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fisher Malting Co. v. Brown
92 A.D. 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
McGrath v. Murtha & Schmohl Co.
128 A.D. 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Brown v. Gauss
95 N.Y.S. 538 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)