Boitano v. PeopLease

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 21, 2003
Docket2003-UP-614
StatusUnpublished

This text of Boitano v. PeopLease (Boitano v. PeopLease) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boitano v. PeopLease, (S.C. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

John David Boitano,        Respondent,

v.

PeopLease, as employer, and USF&G, as carrier,        Appellant.


Appeal From Charleston County
A. Victor Rawl, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-614
Submitted August 20, 2003 – Filed October 21, 2003


AFFIRMED


C. Mac Gibson, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Darryl D. Smalls, of Columbia, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM: The South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission found John David Boitano’s back, leg, and groin injuries were compensable.  The commission’s decision was affirmed by the circuit court, and Boitano’s employer, PeopLease, appeals.  We affirm [1] pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR, and the following authorities:  S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-350 (1986) (final agency decisions must include findings of fact); S.C. Code Ann. § 42-9-40 (1976) (listing five elements for proving claim for hernia);  Adams v. Texfi Industries, 341 S.C. 401, 404, 535 S.E.2d 124, 125 (2000) (findings of an agency are not to be set aside if substantial evidence supports the findings and they are free of legal error);  Brown v. R.L. Jordan Oil Co., 291 S.C. 272, 275, 353 S.E.2d 280, 282 (1987) (stating injuries arising from aggravation of preexisting conditions are compensable); Vulcan Materials Co. v. Greenville County, 342 S.C. 480, 494, 536 S.E.2d 897, 899 (Ct. App. 2000) (“Generally, the format of a final decision is immaterial as long as the substance of the decision is sufficiently detailed so as to allow a reviewing court to determine if the decision is supported by the facts of the case.”).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.


[1]   We affirm this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Texfi Industries
535 S.E.2d 124 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
Vulcan Materials Co. v. Greenville County Board of Zoning Appeals
536 S.E.2d 892 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2000)
Brown v. R. L. Jordan Oil Co.
353 S.E.2d 280 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boitano v. PeopLease, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boitano-v-peoplease-scctapp-2003.