Boisvert v. Ife, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 18, 2007
DocketI.C. NOS. 582866 PH-1607.
StatusPublished

This text of Boisvert v. Ife, Inc. (Boisvert v. Ife, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boisvert v. Ife, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission affirms with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

*********** *Page 2
The following were marked and received into evidence as:

EXHIBITS
Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1 — I.C. forms, medical records and list of medical expenses.

State's Exhibit No. 1 — Articles of Incorporation.

State's Exhibit No. 2 — 2001 Annual Report.

State's Exhibit No. 3 — 2002 Annual Report.

State's Exhibit No. 4 — 2003 Annual Report.

State's Exhibit No. 5 — 2004 Annual Report.

State's Exhibit No. 6 — Employment Security Commission Records.

State's Exhibit No. 7 — North Carolina Industrial Commission coverage screen.

***********
Based on the foregoing Stipulations and the evidence presented, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff began working for Defendant-Employer IFE, Inc., in September 1999. Plaintiff continued to work for Defendant-Employer through her March 10, 2005 date of injury. Plaintiff's duties included billing accounts, sales, helping customers, helping with engraving, and packing and shipping.

2. Defendant-Employer IFE, Inc., was a North Carolina corporation in which Donald A. Merrell was the president. The company's 2001 annual report indicates that the nature of the business was trophies, awards, signage, and promotional products. The Employment Security Commission records for the same federal tax identification number and physical location as *Page 3 Defendant-Employer show that Defendant-Employer had three or more employees from January 1, 2001 through at least December 31, 2005.

3. An employment relationship existed between Plaintiff and Defendant-Employer on March 10, 2005. Defendant-Employer had three or more employees and is subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act (Act). All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and are subject to and bound by the provisions of the Act.

4. On March 10, 2005, the date of Plaintiff's injury, Defendant-Employer did not have workers' compensation insurance as required by the Act.

5. Plaintiff suffered a compensable injury by accident on March 10, 2005, arising out of and in the course of her employment with Defendant-Employer when she fell from a six-foot stepladder while trying to place an old file into storage. Plaintiff suffered injuries to both upper extremities when she fell onto her outstretched hands and also to her teeth due to her face hitting the floor.

6. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $471.91, yielding a compensation rate of $314.62. Defendant-Employer did not provide any wage information or a Form 22 wage chart as required by the Act. Defendant-Employer filed no forms in this case either admitting or denying Plaintiff's claim.

7. Plaintiff was transported by ambulance from Defendant-Employer's location in Waynesville, North Carolina to Haywood Regional Medical Center. After examination and stabilization, Plaintiff was transferred by ambulance to Mission Hospital in Asheville, North Carolina.

8. Upon arrival at Mission Hospital, Plaintiff was admitted in the Emergency Room and diagnosed with comminuted complex fracture/dislocations of right and left elbows involving *Page 4 comminuted fractures of the proximal ulnae, ligamentous disruption, and bilateral fractures of the radial head. She also was diagnosed with a dorsal impaction/avulsion fracture from the dorsal aspect of the triquetrum at the left wrist, without evidence of instability and also had minor facial trauma with mucosal laceration of the lower lip, and a contusion to her right knee. On March 11, 2005, Dr. Stephen Westly performed open reduction internal fixation (hereinafter ORIF) of complex fracture/dislocations of left and right elbows, with ORIF of proximal ulna fractures, left radial head fracture, multiple ligamentous repairs, and resection of unreconstructable right radial head. She was discharged on March 13, 2005.

9. On March 16, 2005, Plaintiff was re-admitted to Haywood Regional Medical Center for reaction to her pain medication.

10. Following stabilization and discharge from Haywood Regional, Plaintiff continued to progress well. At approximately one month after surgery, Plaintiff went to physical therapy and made satisfactory progress.

11. By August 11, 2005, a CT scan showed non-union and surgical debridement of the fracture non-union site with revision internal fixation and iliac crest bone graft was discussed. On August 26, 2005, Dr. Westly performed removal of a broken plate/screw fixation right ulna and ORIF of ulna nonunion with corticocancellous bone graft from the right iliac crest and supplemental application of platelet-rich blood concentrate. Again, Plaintiff continued along her recovery course with physical therapy and continued improvement.

12. In April 2006, Plaintiff was continuing to recover well, but did have considerable prominence of the plate and screw fixation hardware. On June 2, 2006, Dr. Westly performed removal of the plate/screw fixation left ulna/olecranon. *Page 5

13. In addition to her treatment with Dr. Westly, Plaintiff also consulted with Dr. Richard Jones of Southeastern Sports Medicine for right shoulder pain subsequent to her work injury. At her August 16, 2005 evaluation, Dr. Jones opined that Plaintiff was suffering from adhesive capsulitis and impingement syndrome of the right shoulder. Physical therapy and cortisone injections improved her symptoms, and at her final visit on December 5, 2005, Dr. Jones opined that she was much improved, that she should continue with home exercise and return on an as-needed basis.

14. From December 2005 through April 2006, Plaintiff received treatment from Dr. Scheiderich, D.D.S. and Dr. Shawn Kennedy, D.D.S., to restructure and repair teeth that were damaged.

15. As of the date of hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff continued to recover from her latest surgery and faced the possibility of further surgery on the right arm. As a result of her injury, Plaintiff has been totally disabled from working since the date of injury. No doctor had released her to return to work. Plaintiff is entitled to temporary total disability compensation from March 11, 2005 through the date of hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and continuing until further order of the Industrial Commission.

16. Defendant-Employer paid Plaintiff for seven weeks at $380.28 per week and six weeks at $200.00 per week. Defendant-Employer also paid Plaintiff $200.00, to use toward medical expenses. These payments yield a total of $4,061.96, for which Defendant-Employer is entitled to a credit.

17. As of the date of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff had incurred medical expenses totaling $134,227.39, from the following providers: Ambulance Services — $1,311.00; Haywood Regional Medical Center — $8,509.93; Haywood Medical Imaging — $561.00; *Page 6 Haywood ER Physicians — $755.00; Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-93
North Carolina § 97-93
§ 97-94
North Carolina § 97-94(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boisvert v. Ife, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boisvert-v-ife-inc-ncworkcompcom-2007.