Boise City Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City

123 F. 1003, 59 C.C.A. 679, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4047
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boise City Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 F. 232
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 25, 1903·No. No. 914·Published

Opinion

PEE OUEIAM.

The appellant filed a bill in equity against the appellee, setting forth as grounds for equitable relief the facts which are involved in the law ease of Boise City Artesian Hot & Cold Water Company, Limited, v. Boise City, Idaho (just decided by this court), 123 Fed. 232. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the bill for want of equity. The appeal presents no points not involved in the discussion of the law case, and upon the reasoning of that opinion, and the authorities therein cited, the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boise City Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, 123 F. 1003, 59 C.C.A. 679, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4047 (9th Cir. 1903).

123 F. 1003 (Boise City Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related