Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States
This text of 429 F.2d 426 (Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 23656.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
August 31, 1970.
Rehearing Denied September 29, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; Fred M. Taylor, Judge.
James Berlin (argued), of Eberle & Berlin, Boise, Idaho, for appellant.
John S. Brown (argued), Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Stuart A. Smith, Attys., Johnnie Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C.; Jay F. Bates, U. S. Atty., Clarence D. Suiter, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for appellee.
Before BARNES, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion, Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States, D. Idaho, 1968, 288 F.Supp. 770, the judgment should be, and it is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 F.2d 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boise-cascade-corporation-v-united-states-ca9-1970.