Home/Supreme Court/Boineau v. Thornton

Boineau v. Thornton

379 U.S. 15, 85 S. Ct. 151, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 354
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 19, 1964
Docket483
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 U.S. 15 (Boineau v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boineau v. Thornton, 379 U.S. 15, 85 S. Ct. 151, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 354 (1964).

Opinion

379 U.S. 15 (1964)

BOINEAU ET AL.
v.
THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.

No. 483.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 19, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

Ralph E. Becker for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dixie Feed & Seed Co. v. Byrd
379 U.S. 15 (Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 15, 85 S. Ct. 151, 13 L. Ed. 2d 84, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boineau-v-thornton-scotus-1964.