Boik v. Alpena General Hospital
This text of 742 N.W.2d 354 (Boik v. Alpena General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Diann BOIK and Greg Boik, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
ALPENA GENERAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant, and
Alpena County, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent from the denial of leave to appeal in Sturgis Bank & Trust Co. v. Hillsdale Community Health Ctr., 268 Mich.App. 484, 708 N.W.2d 453 (2005). See 479 Mich. 854, 735 N.W.2d 206 (2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 N.W.2d 354, 480 Mich. 1001, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 3247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boik-v-alpena-general-hospital-mich-2007.