Boies v. Joseph
This text of 165 So. 2d 324 (Boies v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to that of Richardson v. Joseph et al., La.App., 165 So.2d 321, this day decided.
Plaintiff, as the owner of a service station to which a customer’s car was delivered for servicing and which was damaged while in his care, instituted this action against John Sumner and his alleged employer, Elijah J. Joseph, for reimbursement of expenses incurred in the repair of the car.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for against Sumner, but rej ecting his demands against defendant Joseph, plaintiff has appealed. The appeal presents only questions of fact as to Joseph’s liability. For reasons assigned in the companion case, Joseph was absolved of liability.
Accordingly, for the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s cost.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 So. 2d 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boies-v-joseph-lactapp-1964.