Bohr v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bohr v. Jones

24 A.D.2d 864, 264 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3087

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 864 (Bohr v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohr v. Jones, 24 A.D.2d 864, 264 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In a paternity proceeding, the alleged father appeals from an order of filiation and support, made by the Family Court, Rockland County, entered December 16, 1964. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and a new trial ordered. In our opinion, the finding that the appellant is the father of the child born to the petitioner is not supported by “ entirely satisfactory ” evidence (cf. Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607; Drummond v. Dolan, 155 App. Div. 449; Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Kotel, 256 App. Div. 352; Matter of Brown v. Labus, 19 A D 2d 554). Under all the circumstances, however, petitioner should be afforded the opportunity to present more satisfactory evidence, if available to her. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a paternity proceeding, the alleged father appeals from an order of filiation and support, made by the Family Court, Rockland County, entered December 16, 1964. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and a new trial ordered. In our opinion, the finding that the appellant is the father of the child born to the petitioner is not supported by “ entirely satisfactory ” evidence (cf. Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607; Drummond v. Dolan, 155 App. Div. 449; Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Kotel, 256 App. Div. 352; Matter of Brown v. Labus, 19 A D 2d 554). Under all the circumstances, however, petitioner should be afforded the opportunity to present more satisfactory evidence, if available to her. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 864, 264 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohr-v-jones-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack