Bohner v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bohner v. Cummings

91 Pa. 55, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 292

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 9, 1879

DocketNo. 98

StatusPublished

This text of 91 Pa. 55 (Bohner v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohner v. Cummings, 91 Pa. 55, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 292 (Pa. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered

Per Curiam.

It is unnecessary to examine the assignments of error in detail. We find nothing of which the plaintiff in error has any just ground to complain. That the married woman had a separate estate was not seriously denied. The only question was, whether it had been invested by her husband as her agent, in the obligations attached. This question was fairly submitted to the jury by the learned court below, upon the evidence, and upon no established principle of law could it have been taken from them.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered

Per Curiam.

It is unnecessary to examine the assignments of error in detail. We find nothing of which the plaintiff in error has any just ground to complain. That the married woman had a separate estate was not seriously denied. The only question was, whether it had been invested by her husband as her agent, in the obligations attached. This question was fairly submitted to the jury by the learned court below, upon the evidence, and upon no established principle of law could it have been taken from them.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 Pa. 55, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohner-v-cummings-pa-1879.