Bohnefeld v. Security National Bank

Supreme Court

Bohnefeld v. Security National Bank

278 U.S. 559, 49 S. Ct. 23, 73 L. Ed. 505, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 12

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 15, 1928

DocketNo. 279

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 278 U.S. 559 (Bohnefeld v. Security National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohnefeld v. Security National Bank, 278 U.S. 559, 49 S. Ct. 23, 73 L. Ed. 505, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 12 (1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The writ [560]*560of error and appeal are dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the appeal as an application for certiorari, the same is denied.

Messrs. E. G. Wilson and J. M. Springer for plaintiff in error and appellant. No appearance for defendant in error and appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The writ [560]*560of error and appeal are dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the appeal as an application for certiorari, the same is denied.

Messrs. E. G. Wilson and J. M. Springer for plaintiff in error and appellant. No appearance for defendant in error and appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 U.S. 559, 49 S. Ct. 23, 73 L. Ed. 505, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohnefeld-v-security-national-bank-scotus-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack