Bohn v. 434 East 59th Street, Inc.

282 A.D. 573, 125 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 573 (Bohn v. 434 East 59th Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bohn v. 434 East 59th Street, Inc., 282 A.D. 573, 125 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant sued to recover rental overcharges of $475 with treble damages. The jury returned a verdict for single damages and upon appeal the Appellate Term reversed the judgment and dismissed the complaint.

The appellant occupied an apartment on the premises of the respondent from September 15,1950, to September 30, 1951, pursuant to a written lease which provided that the apartment was to be occupied as “ living quarters and executive offices ”. The stipulated rent was $110 per month. Some five months previous to September, 1950, a commercial rent of $125 a month had been fixed pursuant to a commercial arbitration with a prior tenant and confirmed by an order of the Supreme Court. The registered maximum residential rent was $62.50 a month.

The trial court submitted to the jury the factual issue of whether the apartment was in fact intended and actually used for residential or commercial purposes. The respondent took no exceptions to the charge and submitted no requests. Implicit in the verdict of the jury was a finding that the intended and actual use of the apartment was for residential purposes.

The fixing of a commercial rent pursuant to law does not deprive a subsequent residential tenant of the protection of the residential rent control and the maximum rent established' thereby. (Cf. Powell v. Park Lex. Realty Corp., 280 App. Div. 136, affd. 304 N. Y. 960.)

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the judgment of the Municipal Court reinstated, with costs to appellant and an allowance to the appellant of an additional counsel fee in the sum of $125.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ., concur.

Determination unanimously reversed in accordance with the opinion herein. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Billings v. Freewalt Realty Corp.
10 Misc. 2d 603 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Schwartz v. Weaver
9 Misc. 2d 788 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Jaffe v. Glay Realty Corp.
2 Misc. 2d 915 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D. 573, 125 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohn-v-434-east-59th-street-inc-nyappdiv-1953.