Bohmont v. Moore

297 N.W. 559, 138 Neb. 907, 133 A.L.R. 279, 1941 Neb. LEXIS 21
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1941·No. No. 30902·Published·Cited by 35 cases

Opinion

Messmore, J.

The motion for rehearing and briefs in support thereof complain of the original opinion, in that the court mistakenly construed the action as one in tort, when, in fact, it was one for breach of contract of bailment.

The plaintiff’s petition sounds in contract and further contains a direct allegation of negligence, thus presenting' two aspects of recovery. Suffice it to say that the rules of law set forth in the opinion are applicable to the plaintiff’s cause of action, based on a breach of the bailment agreement. This supplemental statement is made as a means of clarification and to avoid confusion as to the nature of the action.

The motion for rehearing is denied.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohmont v. Moore, 297 N.W. 559, 138 Neb. 907, 133 A.L.R. 279, 1941 Neb. LEXIS 21 (Neb. 1941).

297 N.W. 559 (Bohmont v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TransCanada Keystone Pipeline v. Tanderup
305 Neb. 493 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
Merritt v. Nationwide Warehouse Co., Ltd.
605 S.W.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1980)
Sniffen v. CENTURY NAT. BK OF BROWARD
375 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
United States v. New England Merchants National Bank
465 F. Supp. 83 (D. Massachusetts, 1979)
Buena Vista Loan & Savings Bank v. Bickerstaff
174 S.E.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Tyler v. Lindell Trust Co.
285 S.W.2d 16 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1955)
Veihelmann v. Manufacturers Safe Deposit Co.
198 Misc. 861 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Bohmont v. Moore
2 N.W.2d 599 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1942)