Bohm v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 767, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2617
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1968
DocketR.D. 11477; Entry No. 812608
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 767 (Bohm v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bohm v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 767, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2617 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Watson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the following Cases:
R66-8438
R66-7051
R66-7050
1. That on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or in the absence of sales freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $60.70 plus packing as indicated on each invoice.
[768]*7682. That the merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, effective February 27, 1958.
3. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27, 1958.
4. Appeal for reappraisement fío. R66-8437 is hereby abandoned by the plaintiff, H. A. Boi-im & Company, a Corporation.
5. That these appeals for reappraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.
6. This stipulation is being submitted before the Honorable Judge James L. Watson, 10-18-67.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value was $60.70 plus packing as indicated on each invoice.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 767, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohm-v-united-states-cusc-1968.