Bohm v. Hansmann
126 A. 923, 96 N.J. Eq. 735, 11 Stock. 735, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 396
This text of 126 A. 923 (Bohm v. Hansmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bohm v. Hansmann, 126 A. 923, 96 N.J. Eq. 735, 11 Stock. 735, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 396 (N.J. 1924).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS — 15.
*Page 736For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 A. 923, 96 N.J. Eq. 735, 11 Stock. 735, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohm-v-hansmann-nj-1924.