Bohlinger v. Zanger

202 Misc. 481, 116 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1856
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 Misc. 481 (Bohlinger v. Zanger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bohlinger v. Zanger, 202 Misc. 481, 116 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1856 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1952).

Opinion

Botein, J.

The plaintiff (as liquidator of an insurance company) concedes that the defendant (an insurance broker) has the right to deduct his commission for the period up to May 2, 1951, as of which date liability of the insurer was terminated by the order of April 30, 1951. The only question presented for determination on this motion for judgment on the pleadings is whether the defendant may withhold from the plaintiff any other portion of premiums paid to him by various assureds.

By virtue of the provisions of section 121 of the Insurance Law the defendant, in legal contemplation, acted for the insurance company in receiving payment of premiums. Section 125 of the Insurance Law makes the broker responsible in a fiduciary capacity to his principal for all funds received. His principal, in view of the provisions of section 121 (supra) is the insurance company. It follows that the defendant is not entitled to withhold from the plaintiff, the liquidator of the insurance company, any part of the premiums paid to him as agent for the insurance company except the commissions above referred to. The motion is granted to the extent of awarding judgment to the plaintiff for the amounts withheld, less the defendant’s commissions. The question of the rights of the assureds who paid the premiums as against the plaintiff is not presented for determination by the present motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evvtex Co. v. Hartley Cooper Associates Ltd.
911 F. Supp. 732 (S.D. New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 Misc. 481, 116 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohlinger-v-zanger-nysupct-1952.