Bohling v. Bronson

130 A.D. 895, 115 N.Y.S. 29
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 A.D. 895 (Bohling v. Bronson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bohling v. Bronson, 130 A.D. 895, 115 N.Y.S. 29 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think the defendant was entitled to information as to tlié present whereabouts of the plaintiff before she should be compelled to try the action. The' order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted requiring the plaintiff’s attorney to inform the defendant’s attorney as to the present address of the plaintiff. All proceedings on the part of the plaintiff are stayed until twenty days after such information is given. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Crder reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted as stated in opinion; proceedings in the meantime stayed. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dike v. Dike
448 P.2d 490 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D. 895, 115 N.Y.S. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohling-v-bronson-nyappdiv-1909.