Bohler v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bohler v. Texas Co.

87 S.E. 157, 17 Ga. App. 382, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 435

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 2, 1915

Docket6280

StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 157 (Bohler v. Texas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohler v. Texas Co., 87 S.E. 157, 17 Ga. App. 382, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 435 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

A promise to pay the debt of another is, under the statute of frauds, void, unless put in writing; but where both parties were primarily liable for the debt, this principle of law is not involved. There was some evidence to support the finding of the trial judge of the municipál court of Atlanta that the plaintiff in error was the real owner of the concern known as “The Whitehall Garage,” when the goods were sold to it by the defendant in error; and that finding having been approved by the appellate division of the municipal court, we will not interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

A promise to pay the debt of another is, under the statute of frauds, void, unless put in writing; but where both parties were primarily liable for the debt, this principle of law is not involved. There was some evidence to support the finding of the trial judge of the municipál court of Atlanta that the plaintiff in error was the real owner of the concern known as “The Whitehall Garage,” when the goods were sold to it by the defendant in error; and that finding having been approved by the appellate division of the municipal court, we will not interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 157, 17 Ga. App. 382, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohler-v-texas-co-gactapp-1915.