Bohlen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bohlen v. State

514 S.W.3d 643, 2017 WL 1149611, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 223

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 2017·No. No. ED 104658·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian Bohlen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian Bohlen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Bohlen v. State, 514 S.W.3d 643, 2017 WL 1149611, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 223 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

514 S.W.3d 643 (Bohlen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.