Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
27 Jones & S. 565, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 565
Opinion
[566] The Court (McAdam, J., writing) held as stated in the head-note, on the ground (as to the third proposition) among others, that the case came within the rule that on a trial by the court without a jury improper testimony may upon reflection be disregarded or stricken out without producing any effect or causing any injury whatever.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 27 Jones & S. 565, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 565 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
27 Jones & S. 565 (Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.