Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
This text of 27 Jones & S. 565 (Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[566]*566The Court (McAdam, J., writing) held as stated in the head-note, on the ground (as to the third proposition) among others, that the case came within the rule that on a trial by the court without a jury improper testimony may upon reflection be disregarded or stricken out without producing any effect or causing any injury whatever.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Jones & S. 565, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohlen-v-metropolitan-elevated-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1891.