Bohl v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

District Court, W.D. Arkansas·Decided October 3, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-02171·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION

KRISTIE MARIE BOHL PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL NO. 21-2171

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, the Court hereby reverses the decision of the Commissioner, and remands this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal. If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" 1.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 3rd day of October 2022.

/s/ ( Aneaty Cometeck HON. CHRISTY COMSTOCK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohl v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, (W.D. Ark. 2022).

Bohl v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Bohl v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)