Bohen v. Auerbach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bohen v. Auerbach

51 A.D.2d 542, 378 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10784

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 542 (Bohen v. Auerbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohen v. Auerbach, 51 A.D.2d 542, 378 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for an upward modification of child support payments, the respondent father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered May 22, 1975, as denied his motion for a protective order and directed him to produce certain items in accordance with an opinion of the same court, dated May 21, 1975. Leave to appeal from the order is hereby granted. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. While the order is not appealable as of right (Family Ct. Act, § 1112), we treat this appeal as including an application for leave to appeal and grant such application nunc pro tunc. We believe that the order under review evidenced a proper exercise of discretion. We have examined appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for an upward modification of child support payments, the respondent father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered May 22, 1975, as denied his motion for a protective order and directed him to produce certain items in accordance with an opinion of the same court, dated May 21, 1975. Leave to appeal from the order is hereby granted. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. While the order is not appealable as of right (Family Ct. Act, § 1112), we treat this appeal as including an application for leave to appeal and grant such application nunc pro tunc. We believe that the order under review evidenced a proper exercise of discretion. We have examined appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 542, 378 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohen-v-auerbach-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack