Bohemian Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nagelbush
This text of 535 So. 2d 357 (Bohemian Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nagelbush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because appellant failed to rebut all of the legally sufficient jurisdictional allegations in appellee’s complaint, those not rebutted must be taken as true. Therefore, jurisdictional grounds were stated and the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under the long-arm statute. See Elmex Corp. v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Association, 325 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
535 So. 2d 357, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5705, 1988 WL 137884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohemian-savings-loan-assn-v-nagelbush-fladistctapp-1988.