Boharas v. Martin
This text of 109 A. 599 (Boharas v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not questioned that this case was for the jury, and the only complaint of the appellants is of the excessiveness of the verdict. This was for the court below on a motion for a new trial. In- refusing it the court said: “The testimony in this case was very conflicting and the case was peculiarly for the jury. Nothing has been suggested that would require us to-interfere with the jury’s determination of the weight and value of the evidence. We cannot say the verdict is excessive.” We have not been persuaded that this was an abuse of discretion, and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A. 599, 266 Pa. 112, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boharas-v-martin-pa-1920.