Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co.

36 S.E. 907, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 841

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 7, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 907 (Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co., 36 S.E. 907, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 841 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. Since only a natural person “ who itinerates for trading purposes ” can, under the statutes of this State, be regarded as a “ peddler,” there is no authority of law for issuing or enforcing against a trading corporation an execution for a special tax alleged to be due by itas a peddler. Wrought Iron Range Co. v. Johnson, 84 Ga. 754.

2. It follows from an application of the foregoing to the facts of the present case that the court did not err in granting the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI