Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co.

36 S.E. 907, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 841
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 7, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. Since only a natural person who itinerates for trading purposes ” can, under the statutes of this State, be regarded as a “ peddler,” there is no authority of law for issuing or enforcing against a trading corporation an execution for a special tax alleged to be due by itas a peddler. Wrought Iron Range Co. v. Johnson, 84 Ga. 754.

2. It follows from an application of the foregoing to the facts of the present case that the court did not err in granting the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co., 36 S.E. 907, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 841 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 907 (Bohannon v. Wrought Iron Range Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawley v. State
195 S.E. 453 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)