Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.

176 S.E. 268, 207 N.C. 163, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 411
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 10, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

It is not perceived upon what theory valid objection to tbe ruling of tbe trial court may be predicated. Having lost its right to a summary writ of assistance by conveying tbe premises to another and allowing tbe matter to be so adjudicated without appeal, movant is in no position to ask for further assistance in tbe present proceeding. Its remedy now is by suit in ejectment.

That one who buys at a judicial sale is entitled to a writ of assistance is not questioned (Bank v. Leverette, 187 N. C., 743, 123 S. E., 68; Knight v. Houghtalling, 94 N. C., 408), but movant parted with tbe title which it acquired under tbe commissioner’s deed before applying for such writ. At any rate, it allowed tbe matter to be so adjudged without appeal.

Affirmed.

ScheNCK, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co., 176 S.E. 268, 207 N.C. 163, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 411 (N.C. 1934).

176 S.E. 268 (Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. . Thompson
189 S.E. 117 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Carter v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
182 S.E. 106 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Dayton v. . Asheville
115 S.E. 827 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)