Bohannon v. State

97 So. 319, 86 Fla. 158
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 14, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submited to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the [159]*159Court that there is no error in the said, judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis, West and Terrell, J. J., concur. Taylor, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohannon v. State, 97 So. 319, 86 Fla. 158 (Fla. 1923).

97 So. 319 (Bohannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.