Bohannon v. Springfield

9 Ala. 789
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1846·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

The merits of this cause lie in a very narrow compass ; the plaintiff declares as on a bailment of the cotton seed to the defendant, and in order to support his declaration, must show either an express contract to re-deliver it, or circumstances from which a contract may be implied, as all bailments are said to be contracts between the bailor and bailee. The proof, however it might sustain another form of action, if a taking or conversion by the defendant, is shown, fails in establishing either an express or implied contract, to re-deliver the cotton seed, and consequently the charges requested should have been given.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohannon v. Springfield, 9 Ala. 789 (Ala. 1846).

9 Ala. 789 (Bohannon v. Springfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott v. Dyche
80 Ala. 376 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Sledge v. Swift, Murphy & Co.
53 Ala. 110 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)