Bohannon v. Poage

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bohannon v. Poage

100 S.E. 27, 24 Ga. App. 108, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 430

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 17, 1919

Docket10510

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 27 (Bohannon v. Poage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohannon v. Poage, 100 S.E. 27, 24 Ga. App. 108, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 430 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. On the trial of an issue raised by counter-affidavit to a distress warrant, where the plaintiff testified to a positive agreement as to rental and fixed definitely the amount of rent to be paid, it was not error to refuse to admit his testimony as to what would be a reasonable rental value of the premises rented. The assignment of error in the motion for a new trial does not show that this testimony was offered merely to corroborate other evidence of the plaintiff.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. On the trial of an issue raised by counter-affidavit to a distress warrant, where the plaintiff testified to a positive agreement as to rental and fixed definitely the amount of rent to be paid, it was not error to refuse to admit his testimony as to what would be a reasonable rental value of the premises rented. The assignment of error in the motion for a new trial does not show that this testimony was offered merely to corroborate other evidence of the plaintiff.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 27, 24 Ga. App. 108, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohannon-v-poage-gactapp-1919.