Bohan v. New York Railways Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bohan v. New York Railways Corp.

254 A.D. 702, 3 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 702 (Bohan v. New York Railways Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohan v. New York Railways Corp., 254 A.D. 702, 3 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Action brought by the plaintiff-administrator, here respondent, to recover damages suffered by himself as husband of the intestate, by reason of her death, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant, here appellant. The issues were tried and submitted to the jury for determination. A verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $10,000 was rendered, upon which judgment was entered. From that judgment defendant appeals. The appellant makes no contention, however, except that the verdict is excessive in amount. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action brought by the plaintiff-administrator, here respondent, to recover damages suffered by himself as husband of the intestate, by reason of her death, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant, here appellant. The issues were tried and submitted to the jury for determination. A verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $10,000 was rendered, upon which judgment was entered. From that judgment defendant appeals. The appellant makes no contention, however, except that the verdict is excessive in amount. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 702, 3 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohan-v-new-york-railways-corp-nyappdiv-1938.