Bohan v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bohan v. County of Westchester

250 A.D.2d 796, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6018

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 796 (Bohan v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bohan v. County of Westchester, 250 A.D.2d 796, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for reinstatement to the position of Director of Internal Auditing for Westchester County, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated May 22, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to his contention, the plaintiff failed to rebut the defendants’ prima facie showing that the defendant County of Westchester abolished his civil service position in a good faith effort to reduce costs and maintain efficiency, and not “as a subterfuge to avoid statutory protection” afforded him pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 (Matter of Klos v Town of Babylon, 237 AD2d 291). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly granted. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for reinstatement to the position of Director of Internal Auditing for Westchester County, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated May 22, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to his contention, the plaintiff failed to rebut the defendants’ prima facie showing that the defendant County of Westchester abolished his civil service position in a good faith effort to reduce costs and maintain efficiency, and not “as a subterfuge to avoid statutory protection” afforded him pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 (Matter of Klos v Town of Babylon, 237 AD2d 291). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly granted. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 796, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bohan-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack